Student Needs Are Simple
I am not claiming for putting out the Common Core Standards. At least they will enforce reason on the existing ridiculous patchwork of state standards and finally make it possible for authors, software designers, test makers, and textbook publishers to offer the most resources at the least cost. But let us not consider these standards as anything more than a diffident reordering of previous state standards, declared by people familiar only with traditional courses and requirements.
As an alternative, let us face the future by waiting to consider again the wisdom of Herbert Spencer and the authors of the Cardinal Principles. First and foremost, one must consider the questions that every wise person, who takes education seriously, asks themselves. What do you intend to accomplish in secondary school? What are your goals? What do our society and our students need from school, regardless of conservative tradition or existing policy trends? Then we may finally have a diploma worth giving and receiving in the modern age. Handel’s study in 2007 stated, “As a recent study indicated, only around 5 percent of the population really need algebra II in their work.”
Instead of creating backward from the traditions of college admission or the practical demands of presently “hot” jobs, this list designs backward from the crucial human capabilities needed for successful adulthood whatever the school or job is. How odd, for instance, that our existing conditions do not include oral proficiency when all graduates will need this skill in their personal, civic, social, and professional lives. How regrettable for us personally, professionally, and socially that all high school and college students are not obliged to study ethics.
Here’s a cool video teaching you how to adult:
The financial collapse of the latest years highlights a related point: Recognizing our economic system is far more important than studying textbook chemistry. In science, how sad that physics is perceived as more important than psychology and human development, as parents work hard to raise children wisely and families persevere to understand one another. The principle of inertia from physics could explain it!
I had possibly the best undergraduate education in the United States, if the aim is academic power. But would I require that all colleges look like St. John’s? Definitely not, any more than I would require that all schools implement my recommended course list as graduation requirements. In contrast, my support for injecting philosophy, economics, and human development into the incredibly narrow traditional curriculum is a call to bring a richer range of options to students.
Setting standards in the way we do—requiring conditions for all by looking at our own generation’s academic knowledge rather than forward to the developmental needs of all students— hinders improvement rather than developing it. Then, we add insult to damage: a one-size-fits-all diploma. Overall, it appears to me that we still do not have a hint about how to make education innovative: forward-looking, client-focused, and flexible; changed to an era where the future, not the past, defines the curriculum. Jika anda sedang mencari kolej kerajaan, anda harus memilih kolej and ada reputasi yang baik.